An anonymous reader writes “The NYTimes is running a front-page story about lawyers for suspects in terrorism-related cases fearing government monitoring of privileged conversations. But instead of speaking about the technological solutions, the lawyers fly half way across the world to meet with their clients. In fact, nowhere in the article is encryption even mentioned. Is it possible that lawyers don’t even know about PGP?” The New Yorker has a detailed piece centering on the Oregon terrorism case discussed by the Times.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Entries (RSS)